Wednesday, 16 December 2015

The thought police are livid about my cartoon? Now that’s funny

BILL LEAK
THE AUSTRALIAN
DECEMBER 16, 2015 12:00AM
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/opinion/the-thought-police-are-livid-about-my-cartoon-now-thats-funny/news-story/e1141c321cd25c67b81803f997d42021

Bill Leak’s cartoon from Monday’s edition of The Australian.


I don’t know an associate professor of sociology at Macquarie University called Amanda Wise, but she knows me. She knows me so well, in fact, that she’s not only able to tell me what my cartoons mean, but she’s also able to tell me what I was thinking while I was drawing them.
There I was, naively thinking that if I drew a group of poor Indian people trying to eat solar panels contained in parcels sent to them by the UN anyone seeing the cartoon would assume it meant the people in it were hungry. But, no. What I thought I was thinking wasn’t what I was thinking at all. According to Ms Wise, my “unequivocally racist” cartoon drew on “very base stereotypes of third world, underdeveloped people who don’t know what to do with technology”.
These and other startling revelations were included in an article by Amanda Meade in The Guardian on Monday. As well as being sternly reminded by the shocked Ms Wise that my cartoon would be unacceptable in Britain, the US and Canada (heaven forbid!), I was also told my cartoon was “racist” by no less an authority than Yin Paradies of Deakin University, whose research includes the economic effects of racism.
Professor Paradies didn’t think I’d made the people in my cartoon look hungry, either, but rather, in my own twisted, racist way, I’d managed to portray not only them but the entire population of India as “too stupid to handle renewable energy”.
I’ve been reliably informed my cartoon also triggered a hostile response from the sanctimonious but bloodthirsty mob who spend their time trawling the internet looking for anything they find offensive to provide them with an opportunity to join the orgy of competitive compassion and moral grandstanding that is Twitter.
Such people, understandably, are probably on a bit of a high at the moment having just spent a couple of weeks watching heroic and revered climate scientists such as Leonardo DiCaprio, Sean Penn and Robert Redford spouting a series of hypocritical platitudes in Paris that culminated in world leaders signing up to an agreement to meet again in five years so they can sign another one, thereby saving the world from an impending environmental catastrophe. Again. No wonder they’re angry. First chance I get I spoil the party by reminding them that, back here, in the real world, there are billions of people who not only lack food, health, water and education, but also have no access to electricity, and more than 20 per cent of them live in India.
And there’s something obscene about the fact that there are billions of others who’ve had all those things all their coal-power-driven lives and they’re now distributing solar panels to the world’s poor because they think that provides a virtuous, if inadequate, form of electricity for which they should be grateful. I think that’s racist, I think it’s condescending, and I think it’s immoral. But it’s also the truth, and when an impertinent cartoonist dares to tell the truth these days he’d better watch out because telling the truth is a dangerously subversive thing to do.
It has the same ability to simultaneously shock some people while amusing others that four-letter words used to have when Lenny Bruce discovered he could use them to such devastating effect that his audiences would still be laughing while he was being dragged offstage by the police and arrested for obscenity.
In court, Bruce argued he was being denied his right to freedom of speech, and so he was. But I can’t help thinking he had it easy, living at a time when the only people who had to stand up for their rights to freedom of speech were comedians who wanted to say f. k in public.
And not only that, but the only people he had to worry about offending were undercover coppers in the audience whose job it was to be offended so they could arrest him for doing his job.
These days, the undercover policemen in the audience waiting for him to swear would be the least of his worries. They’d be outnumbered 100 to one by members of the Politically Correct Thought Police Task Force, all armed with iPhones and Twitter accounts, ready to pounce the moment he said something that might not necessarily offend them but could, potentially, offend someone else.
There’s no doubt the cartoon I drew for Monday’s paper offended a lot of people. While they might not have enjoyed looking at it, I’m quite sure they enjoyed using it as an excuse to parade their moral vanity.
And, while I prefer to discover there are people who think my cartoons are funny, I’d be lying if I said I didn’t derive a certain amount of pleasure from discovering they enrage the ones that don’t.

Thursday, 10 December 2015

Queensland - Letters Patent: The Moreton Bay Courier Saturday, December 10, 1859 page 2







Race for parliamentary positions in wake of Queensland Cabinet reshuffle

December 10, 2015 12:00am
Jason TinThe Courier-Mail


Bulimba MP Di Farmer: missed out..

JOCKEYING for plum parliamentary positions is set to begin in the wake of the Cabinet reshuffle, with snubbed MP Di Farmer potentially in line for a $20,000 pay rise.

The appointments of Labor Unity faction member Grace Grace and Left faction member Mick de Brenni to the new-look ministry have left their previous parliamentary roles up for grabs.

Ms Grace served as Deputy Speaker and Mr de Brenni sat as Chief Government Whip.

Both roles come with pay packets that are more than $80,000 fatter than the base MP salary of almost $150,000.

Party insiders anticipate the positions will remain with the Left and Labor Unity, with each nabbing one of the spots.

Labor Unity is hoping Ms Farmer will fill one of the vacancies, given she missed out on a ministry spot.

Unity was only able to snare one additional Cabinet position in Premier Annastacia Palaszczuk’s reshuffle, with Ms Grace taking on the Employment, Industrial Relations, Racing and Multicultural Affairs portfolios.

Ms Farmer, a Unity member, missed out on both a ministry and an assistant ministry position.
The Member for Bulimba is currently chair of the Finance and Administration Committee, which earns her an extra $57,000 on top of her base salary.

An appointment to either Mr de Brenni or Ms Grace’s former positions would add more than $20,000 to Ms Farmer’s pay packet.


Grace Grace is the new Employment and Industrial Relations Minister.

Fellow Labor Unity MP Julieanne Gilbert currently serves as Deputy Government Whip.

Among the names touted within the Left as possible Chief Government Whip replacements are Nikki Boyd and Chris Whiting.

Queensland news, politics, entertainment and business - Corridors of Power

December 10, 2015 12:00am

Tuesday, 8 December 2015

Premier Annastacia Palaszczuk’s Cabinet reshuffle has angered some Labor figures


Premier Annastacia Palaszczuk’s Cabinet reshuffle has angered some Labor figures


Saturday, 5 December 2015

Government report card reflects Labor’s highs and lows

Government report card reflects Labor’s highs and lows


The Courier-Mail

IT’S been 10 months in a leaky boat. And, to borrow from Split Enz, the Palaszczuk Government has been lucky just to keep afloat.

The absence of an overarching narrative, a decision-lite approach, Cook MP Billy Gordon’s forced resignation and the melodramas of trouble-prone police minister Jo-Ann Miller has left the Labor armada listing.

Interspersed between wave after wave of internal drama and a void of decisions, Annastacia Palaszczuk and several of her ministers have shown some handy skills at the tiller.


Today’s annual Report Card by The Courier-Mail, which comes only days before the Queensland Premier is due to reshuffle her Cabinet, reflects the highs and low of the Labor administration.
Their marks stretch from an “A” to an “E”, with some standout efforts by both experienced and new members of Cabinet along with several lacklustre and truly diabolical performances.
Palaszczuk herself receives a “B” after leading Labor to a dramatic victory over the LNP.
She’s also begun building a solid platform around innovation and taken on the insidious issue of domestic violence.

However, while an “A” was hers for the taking after such a result, the odium of Labor’s ongoing poor poll support, the malaise surrounding the Government’s decision-making and squibbing on personally punting Miller as a minister all eroded Palaszczuk’s mark.

Meanwhile her deputy, Jackie Trad, tops the table with an “A-”.

Despite an overloaded mix of portfolios in Palaszczuk’s pint-sized 14-member ministry, Trad always appears across the detail and proves she’s not a die-wondering type when it comes to decisions.

Cameron Dick and Kate Jones, who both return after three years on the political sidelines, are irreplaceable linchpins of the Palaszczuk Government and receive “B+” marks.

Dick delivers gravitas in Parliament against Labor’s experienced and tactically superior opponent while Jones has deftly handled a plethora of portfolios, which in other states are spread across three ministries.

Then there are talented newcomers, such as Shannon Fentiman and Mark Bailey, first-term MPs who have both shown the ability to perform higher duties.

Yet there are several lowlights and they’re led by Treasurer Curtis Pitt.

The Mulgrave MP is the first treasurer in more than a decade not to get a pass mark in the Report Card.

Labor’s lack of a credible economic agenda has been its most significant weakness.

While Pitt is a genuine and thoughtful individual, he hasn’t shown any sign he’s willing to put ideology aside and pull the necessary fiscal levers or do the work required to instil confidence or sell Labor’s economic message.

And finally former police minister Jo-Ann Miller, who quit Cabinet yesterday, has earned the first “E” in many years.

Miller’s own colleagues found her behaviour “reckless” and she has constantly created distractions that Labor could ill afford. Even in quitting she managed to leave the Premier with egg on her face given Palaszczuk had only committed to move her to a new ministry.

Overall, the Government has limped over the line with a pass mark but only just.

They end the year with barely more than one in three Queenslanders prepared to support them, according to the recent Galaxy Poll, which is extremely poor for a new government that should be surging under a popular and capable premier.

The bottom line of this year’s Report Card is that the Palaszczuk Government has the ability but isn’t applying itself properly.

They’ll need to sail in 2016 or they may sink.

The Palaszczuk Government
Overall
C-
Barely a pass mark for an administration that at times seems hellbent on reaffirming it is an accident. After 10 months in office, Labor has cobbled together only the bare bones of a narrative surrounding jobs and innovation. They’ve thrown their energies into tearing down Newman-era reforms and handing sops to their union bedfellows. Without a plan for infrastructure and jobs generation, and with a hide-and-seek approach to state debt, Labor could soon be exposed.

B
Palaszczuk has rightly earned a place in the annals of Labor history for kicking out Campbell Newman. Her friendly, homespun approach is endearing and it’s pushed up her popularity. But it’s not leading to a revival of the Labor vote given barely more than one in three people support the Government. Palaszczuk’s minders attach her to only positive issues. But she’s been left saying “I know nothing” too many times, making her look less than a leader.

A-
After Anna Bligh’s 2012 annihilation you’d imagined a generation would pass before a Left faction South Brisbane MP would be the next potential Labor leader. But Trad has tossed off that albatross and established herself as the clear heir should Palaszczuk perish. A rare conviction politician and a quality performer in Parliament. Producing and funding an infrastructure plan and ensuring decisions are made on all manner of reviews will be her true test.

D+
The most important portfolio in which governments need their minister to perform. Yet his colleagues are convinced Pitt is under performing. A genuine, decent bloke in an indecent profession, Pitt’s Budget debt switch and superannuation payment delay were clever politics but stopgap measures. He risks losing control of expenses through wage agreements. He’s simply not doing the hard work to hammer home the Government’s economic message, whatever that is.

B+
Palaszczuk pinched from Newman’s playbook and handed a leadership rival the poison chalice portfolio. However, Dick took over a hospital system in good health and it has not infected his ambition. A more nuanced narrative about his health priorities would have earned him an even higher mark. The Government’s best performer in Parliament who can cut through with a message. He would be a more valuable asset in an economic portfolio.

B+
Three years out of the political arena in Ashgrove may have been the best thing for Jones. She’s returned with a much more confident and mature approach that has made her integral to the administration. Handed a mega ministry, Jones has needed every ounce of her energy to keep across her portfolios amid some trouble events. With a penchant for policy, relieving her of some responsibilities would help the Government deliver a much broader agenda.

C+
Mixing doctors and politics has proven a prescription for misfortune in the past. Yet Lynham’s non-politician persona has been a breath of fresh air, particularly with the Government’s booze crackdown. But Lynham hasn’t developed a pointy end to his politics, leaving him vulnerable to opponents. While he appears across his portfolio, losing control of vegetation management laws was a sign his colleagues aren’t convinced he can prosecute an issue.

C+
D’Ath’s management of former chief justice Tim Carmody and his replacement were handled with aplomb. Her decisions are considered and consultative. The stark contrast with the Newman-era handling of justice is a stand out for this administration. However, after snaring a second political life and spending only a brief time in opposition, D’Ath comes across as angry all the time which is hard to understand and could prove problematic when a difficult issue arises as it inevitably will.

E
Calamity Jo became like comic relief in a bad spaghetti western. Just when the heroes of this story looked like winning the day, Miller repeatedly managed to ignite another stick of dynamite on her own side. With a talent for turning molehill issues into mountains and an inability to admit error, Miller was clearly unfit for Cabinet. She boasts of being Labor to her bootstraps but the best thing for the party would have been that she be uninvited from the ministry months ago.

D+
Like the daggy uncle you only catch up with for Christmas, Byrne seems always on the verge of saying something inappropriate. Not out of his depth in the ministry but seems to be treading water without floaties. The lack of any Labor agenda for agriculture and its distaste for the racing industry hasn’t helped Byrne establish himself as a worthwhile contributor. Sub par parliamentary performances have made him an opposition target.

C+
Bailey has turned himself from a liability into an asset. His early decision to delay electricity deregulation and talk of people switching to blankets and BBQs because of power prices was a poor start. But opposition attacks on him have dried up as Bailey has gained a solid grip on his portfolio and sharpened his rhetoric around a clear narrative. After his mid-career sojourn, Bailey’s training as a councillor has aided his transition from first-term MP to capable minister.

C
Passion and enthusiasm aplenty made Miles the perfect fit for this portfolio. He has a broad depth of knowledge and significant respect in a sector tired of having the environment ministry used as a stepping stone. However, Miles is yet convince Cabinet that the Government should take major steps in the environmental arena. With key decisions and improved Parliament performances, Miles has the potential for an improved mark next year.

C-
Given innovation is a key priority for the Palaszczuk Government, it’s a wonder Queenslanders haven’t heard more from their Innovation Minister. Some might even be surprised to learn we have one. Not without ability, Enoch is showing the tell tale signs of being prisoner to her department’s mandarins and put this on display when she praised an employee for their diligence when they double paid a contractor millions of dollars.

B-
Watching Fentiman’s Parliament performances can be like being at a high school debating contest and not being able to sneak out the back door. But she has talent to burn and given she holds what should be a safe seat, will be a key player for her party for many years to come. As a first-term MP, Fentiman has done an invaluable job leading domestic violence reform. A prime candidate for promotion in the future.

D
If Cabinet’s 14th minister set out to prove the ministry doesn’t even need 14 ministers, O’Rourke has done an outstanding job. Geography was one of the main reasons O’Rourke earned a ministry. And in 10 months O’Rourke has not managed to put herself or the issues in her portfolio on the map. Being a minister is more than talking about holding talks. However, there have been times in Parliament when Labor has wished she’d stopped talking altogether.

Steven Wardill is The Courier-Mail’sstate political editor

Clive Palmer, Bruce McIver brought us down: Campbell Newman

Clive Palmer, Bruce McIver brought us down: Campbell Newman


Campbell Newman. Picture: Jamie Hanson
There have been public bouts of deep recrimination and self-analysis. A tough book co-authored by beaten premier Campbell Newman. Even a political post-mortem report, overseen by the Liberal National Party’s then Queensland president, Bruce McIver.

All have purported to provide insights into why Newman’s hard-charging Queensland government went from the greatest electoral majority in the state’s history — with 78 out of 89 seats on taking power in 2012 — to humiliation and a massive loss to Labor three years later.

In most analysis until now, one problem has been overlooked or airbrushed: the extraordinary internal conflicts and corrosive impacts arising from McIver’s commercial relationship with Clive Palmer, one of the great backers, then wreckers, of the parliamentary wing.

Now, in extraordinarily frank comments, Newman has named that relationship as one of the drivers of his downfall: “Our issues were clearly (made worse) by the relationship between the president and Clive at the time.”

As Palmer’s commercial and political interests edged closer to implosion this week, with his lawyers warning of a financial “drop-dead date” due to his businesses being out of cash, Newman, along with former deputy premier Jeff Seeney, current deputy leader John-Paul Langbroek and other party figures, have revealed some answers to questions at the heart of the government’s failure.

Could McIver properly serve the LNP while simultaneously serving the party’s backer-cum-relentless attacker, Palmer, as a generously remunerated director of five of the tycoon’s Singapore-registered companies, as part of Asia Pacific Shipping Enterprises PTE Ltd? Did their personal and commercial ties fuel Palmer’s unrealistic expectations and, in turn, ratchet up demands he made of Newman and Seeney, both of whom were powerfully lobbied to favour the major donor’s proposed coal project in central Queensland?

Newman said: “I say with great regret, not anger, that Clive caused us so much damage, but Bruce didn’t get that. I have always been privately very disappointed that Bruce didn’t see it was a major conflict of interest for him from the beginning to be the leader of the LNP — the president of the party — as well as a director of some of Clive’s companies, all at the same time Clive was a big donor who then became one of our most outspoken critics.

“The president was on Clive’s payroll at a time when Clive was fighting the party. People were concerned and angry about it. We had meetings in the partyroom where we were asking ‘what the hell are we going to do about this?’, because Clive was throwing rocks at us publicly. Here was a guy trying to take down the new government in 2012.

“I have always been totally nonplussed that Bruce McIver could have wanted to have such a situation continue. I have never understood why he remained on Clive’s payroll. I just don’t know why you would do that.

“There were many contributing factors to the fall of the government, including plenty of our own actions, but our issues were clearly (made worse) by the relationship between the president and Clive at the time.”

Party elders, including a former president and major donors, worked hard to counsel McIver and persuade him to sever his ties to Palmer, according to a senior source, “but Bruce wouldn’t hear of it — he kept going as a director”. In the meantime, according to Supreme Court legal documents, Palmer in April 2012 was demanding preferential treatment for a massive coalmining venture in the Galilee Basin.

He allegedly said, “I have paid a lot of money to get you guys elected and I have a lot more money to continue to do that in the future.”

Seeney, who rebuffed Palmer, is being sued along with Newman for defamation by the tycoon, who denies any wrongdoing. The Australian began investigating Palmer after reports of his expectations of the government began to leak.

By the time the McIver cord with Palmer was cut in 2013, huge damage had been done to the party, according to senior sources, and there was a palpable lack of trust between Newman and the party president and others.

“I know that (the then treasurer) Tim Nicholls, Jeff Seeney and (current Opposition Leader) Lawrence Springborg also saw it as highly inappropriate, but nobody could get the president to see otherwise,’’ Newman says.

“Clive believed that because he had been such a big supporter of the party, and because he had these relationships with the president, that would mean that when the LNP formed a government, Clive would have great influence over it. When he was rebuffed, he got very angry.”

The public record shows that after Seeney and Newman refused to give Palmer’s projects preferential treatment, he publicly sledged the premier and his deputy. It was a precursor to the formation of his Palmer United Party and his pledge to demolish Newman.

Singapore company documents show McIver continued as a director of Palmer’s commercial interests into 2013. Five companies were set up in 2012 to raise finance to buy and build ships to transport ore to and from Palmer’s loss-making Queensland Nickel refinery at Townsville. It is now on the brink of collapse.

The LNP’s code of ethics says office-bearers “should be mindful that their positions derive from the party and carry a responsibility to support the party’s welfare and structure by word and action” and “a member should not engage in any practice that corrupts the integrity of the party, its membership or the political process”.

McIver, who has served on the LNP executive since stepping down as president and remains in touch with Palmer, said people were “trying to rewrite history” about his role. Asked whether he put his business interests with Palmer ahead of the LNP, he said: “I would reject that totally — it makes me laugh. Clive could not get anything from me as party president because I was not in the government. I don’t think he even thought he could exert influence on the government through me.

“It was part of my job to try to manage Clive and it wasn’t easy. He was going to take us on in the courts. It would have been much worse if I had not had the relationship with him … I would stand up anywhere and say that I had the highest integrity in these matters.”

McIver said he did not believe Palmer “was even a contributing factor” to the government’s failure at the ballot box on January 31 this year, adding: “I saw the polling.”

Asked about his role as a director of Palmer-owned shipping entities, he said: “Those companies were offshore. They had nothing to do with Queensland. My role started in 2011, then we registered the companies in early 2012. I was chairman of the (company) board. I ran the show.”

Seeney, who continues in parliament as an opposition member, said yesterday: “The party hierarchy had a commercial benefit in me keeping Clive happy but it became increasingly impossible. Clive’s expectations were based on his relationship with Bruce as an individual and with the party as a major supporter.

“It was a major part of the demise of the government — much more so than has been publicly recognised — because it took a lot of energy out of us in the early days. It soured the relationships between the parliamentary wing and the organisation and it created a snowballing effect.”
According to Langbroek, who was deposed as leader to make way for Newman’s takeover from City Hall in 2011, McIver’s style and strength transformed the party and delivered it into government, “but I think he was compromised by his relationship with a wealthy man in Clive who wanted to buy the party”.

“Those in the parliamentary wing tried to do our jobs but there was an estrangement with the party,’’ Langbroek said.